High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Why Aren’t We Upset That it is IN There?

Someone recently told me that they didn’t approve of something being banned in order to make people adopt healthy behaviors/be healthy, in this case High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS). Let’s talk about that.

HFCS is a manufactured food product not found in a natural state. HFCS became popular in the 1980’s and is used in MANY food products as a sugar substitute (I was shocked to see it recently in Yoplait 99% fat-free yogurt, a highly recognized and touted “diet” food) and as a preservative – increasing the shelf life of a product.

There are two schools of thought: those who believe that consuming HFCS is contributing to the obesity epidemic, and those, including medical professionals, who believe that HFCS is relatively the same as table sugar. The reality is that HFCS IS artificial, is used in concentrated – sweeter, more caloric – amounts, and is found in MANY of the foods and beverages that have become part of daily diets for many families: sodas, cookies, candies, bread, boxed and canned soups, boxed juice drinks, jellies and yes, even yogurt.

The reality is, this is an issue of equity. Processed foods – more affordable and more available to lower income families – often have a higher ratio of calories (“empty calories”) to other essential nutrients than unprocessed foods. And the reality is, these products are far less expensive than eating an all-natural diet. The groups least likely to afford an all-natural diet, likely consuming higher amounts of processed foods containing HFCS, are also the ethnic and socioeconomic groups that are seeing rapidly increasing numbers of overweight and obesity in their communities.

Manufacturers of all-natural products have returned to using alternatives to sweeten their products such as cane sugar and its juice, beet sugar and honey. It’s being done, and it’s being done while still maintaining flavor. So why can’t these all-natural alternatives be used for every product calling for HFCS (leaving out the fact that the federal government heavily supports the corn industry so they have a stake in the results)?

Healthy food alternatives should be available to everyone, not just those who can afford to buy a more expensive product. Isn’t EVERYONE’S life as valuable as the next person’s? Shouldn’t everyone be afforded the same access and availability to practice healthy behaviors? And isn’t it up to those who may know or understand how to read a nutrition label and the dangers/benefits of the ingredients, to educate others and then allow them to make informed choices regarding their health? Because I guarantee you, no one is given the choice to pay for health care costs associated with chronic diseases related to obesity, yet tax-payers feed into the system and we are all affected in some way.

Finally, I just want to know: why is it that no one cried when the artificial ingredients were being put INTO our foods? The voices are so loud when the health industry wants them removed…

Visit The Center for Science in the Public Interest for a list of food additives and their safety ratings.


-“The Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States: Executive Summary” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

“The Health Effects of High Fructose Syrup, Report 3 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-08)” The American Medical Association http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/443/csaph3a08-summary.pdf

-“Metabolic Dangers of High Fructose Corn Syrup.” Dana Flavin MS. MD, PhD. Life Extension Magazine

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

15 Responses to “High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Why Aren’t We Upset That it is IN There?”

  1. kitchens says:

    Since searching for quite a while for finding a skilled view about this kind of field . Looking around in Google I eventually uncovered this url. Looking at this post I am delighted to convey that I get a nice sense I came across exactly what I was ready for. For certain i will ensure to don’t forget this blog and look it over on a constant basis.

  2. Very detailed info. I am very happy to I found this entry.. 🙂

  3. Elofabolley says:

    t’s such a great site. cool, acutely intriguing!!!




  4. Cool website, I hadn’t noticed rsquaredhealth.com previously during my searches!
    Keep up the excellent work!

  5. Great, I never knew this, thanks.

  6. ogrzewanie says:

    This is my second visit to this blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same category as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a marvellous job.

  7. I have been following your blog for three days now and I should say I am starting to like your post. Now how do I subscribe to your blog?

    • rrafii says:

      You can click on the RSS feed button on the upper right hand corner of the home page. Follow the instructions and you should be able to receive updates when I update this blog. If you have problems, first check your that the browser you are using is compatible, If you are still having problems, email me with your error message at reema@hvd.b56.myftpupload.com and I will investigate. Thank you!

  8. BernieR says:

    Hola, ЎUf, me gustу! Tan clara y positiva.
    Have a nice day


  9. I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style of blogging. I added it to my favorites web page list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my site as well and let me know what you think. Thanks.

    • rrafii says:

      Thank you so much! I plan on speeding up the blog entries soon – it’s been a task to switch over to, and build, a new site. I’m still learning! Appreciate your support!

  10. Amy Stone says:

    ABSOLUTELY Reema!!! If the move was more towards organic…the growers/farmers/producers would have more demand…and be able to up their supplies…which would mean they could make a living without charging body parts for the products.Honestly, I just think that along with changes for climate control, we-as a society need to return to not having the expectation of food outside of it's natural season.Live more in harmony with the Earth and her cycles and what those cycles produce. Just my 1/2 a cent.:)

  11. Reema says:

    I would think that the cost of the alternative products would even out as more supply is made to meet the demand… It would also require (and inspire?) competition between manufacturers to offer a wider range of all-natural products that are more affordable. How long that would take is the question. However, (and I need to check actual research) it wasn't very long after the movement to remove/reduce partially-hydrogenated oils that more and more trans-fat free products became available. Of course, it's important o read and understand labels here to because the FDA calls "zero" anything less than .5g of trans fat per serving …

  12. Kelly says:

    You go, girl. Love a gal with convictions. I'm with you, I would not shed one tear if we ditched the stuff entirely. But wouldn't forcing makers of products with HFCS to switch to a healthier alternative drive the price of the product up to the point where it's not helping the people groups that need it most? I don't know what the answer is. But I am not a fan of HFCS. Good job bringing us the facts, ma'am!

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Save Big on Verizon Cell Phones Online. | Thanks to Money Insight, Conveyancing solicitors and Sell Car